Content, moreover getting content, is a constant struggle of the web designer. I think you would be hard pressed to find a designer who would say otherwise. However, getting content isn’t enough. It should be good content, well written, well thought out and friendly to its platform.

Over the years, I’ve learned to take greater liberties in copy writing, along side my web designing. It is not an area I particularly want to get into, but I see it as necessarily married to design itself. I make no claim to be expert in the art of writing, but I have some experience and think I can find my way around.

The inclination to become more liberal in my offerings of copywriting, as part of the design process, stemmed from the idea that words, like design, follow a cadence. The thinking is that these inflections should work in tandem together (i.e. Harmony Good. Dissonance Bad.).

In practice, I don’t sell myself as a copywriter, but rather introduce copywriting into my design. There has been a long standing discussion amongst designers, around the use of Loren Ipsum filler, in place of actual content, during the design phase. The school of thinking behind this, is the minimization of distraction in the design review process. Of course, the notion of inaugurating meaningless text into design, as filler, is problematic. For one, written text ushers in the notion of meaning, whether meaningless or meaningful. In the same sense, design ushers in the same notion, even more so when the design is for interactive websites.

So over the years, I’ve been in the practice of reclaiming this part of design, in the form of the written word. The tempo, language and, for lack of a better word, mood of the written content of a website, has a much to do with design and user experience, as does the subtle gradient or drop shadow used to offset a focal point on a page.

There is a lot of writing on the web at present, skirting around this topic, one way or another, but I haven’t seen anyone take this particular stance. Personally, I think the web would benefit greatly, if more designers would don the attire of the copywriter (at least a visor, now and then).

Semantic Web Trending in 2008

If Web design and development were fashion, linguists would be the new black in 2008. Beyond the confines of traditional Web vehicles, the need for smart applications is staking its’ claim. Leading this push, are the fledgling efforts of several Web applications, now touting something akin to good old Sci-Fi artificial intelligence.

In a sense, we’re seeing the beginnings of a quasi-Marxist ai, finding more and more space on the web. I’m guessing we’ll see an explosion (poof) in semantic web applications in 2008, even if only from behind the private beta curtain. A fair number of semantic applications are well into development and a few have even made the break into the public domain. But are we ready?

Understanding Communication

The key to the semantics in the Web applications I refer to, is meaning. The theory of signs, as put by the Vienna Circle, can be broken down into 3 parts:

• Semantics: The relation between signs and the things they refer to.
• Syntactics: The relation of signs to each other in formal structures.
• Pragmatics: The relation of signs to their impacts on those who use them.

Web design inherently and irrevocably depends on all three of these disciplines. Where as traditional web applications, and programming for that matter, looks to apply meaning through signs, semantic Web applications attempt to extract meaning from signs. This is normally the part of semiotics left up to us, the humans, the “thinkers,” if you will.

The Algorithm Killed The Cat

Now, the game is to take some of the burden off us over-worked, poor slobs, and let the applications do some of our thinking for us. I kid, but the fact is, I’m all for it. The smarter the team, right? And from where I’m sitting, the Web is most definitely part of my team. You may remember a rather plaintive ad campaign, started by Ask.com sometime in the spring of 2007. The attempt, on behalf of Ask.com, was to distinguish itself from other search engines, by identifying it’s unique algorithm as the source for better results. In a sense, they are crafting the beginnings of a semantic search engine that understands both what the user queries and the available pickings, to return the best matches. This goes beyond a simple or even complex keyword search engine, such as Google. Does it work? Beats me.

The real question is, what was Crispin, Porter + Bogusky, the agency behind this campaign, thinking? The ad campaign slings slogans from “The Algorithm Killed Jeeves” to “The Algorithm Constantly Finds Jesus.” As the Jeeves version adorned billboards in San Francisco, it only struck me as a kind of apology from Ask.com for sucking. In any case, what does this tell the layman? And more importantly, how do you explain a technology that is supposed to think for you?

Thinking so you don’t have to.

Perhaps up and coming semantic Web applications can learn something from our friend Ze, and tout slogans modeled around his famous sign off for the Show, “..thinking so you don’t have to.”

Thinking may be a stretch, but understanding is the challenge (at least from a developer stand point). Semantic applications open the field of Web development to new territory. One of which, being linguistics.

Deriving contextual meaning from text and images is most definitely a task that can produce results nearing that of intelligence and thought (at least on the surface, when done extremely well). To get these results, requires thorough understanding of language, syntax, grammar and how all these constructs are broken. So, it’s not surprising that we’re seeing an increase of linguists on development teams. And maybe this isn’t such an unnatural thing.

As an example, one of San Francisco’s very own semantic application start ups, Powerset, has been working on a natural language search engine for some time now. The idea is that meaning and knowledge are extracted by Powerset, as apposed to keyword based queries. The results reflect something closer to a database of knowledge, rather than a listing of what’s available.

Powerset is currently in private testing still, but I have a feeling we will be seeing this type of application making a huge impact this year.